In a recent discussion I had on Twitter about DACA, I argued for radically expanding legal immigration and was accused of appealing to emotion. Was I? Or was my interlocutor (and do immigration opponents do so, more generally)? This and more on today’s show. See Program Notes, below, for all the stories, etc., I plan to discuss.
Join in live, either by phone or in the chat room at BlogTalk Radio!
The show can be accessed here.
To access the show’s page at BlogTalk Radio, which will allow you to check out a past episode or to subscribe via iTunes and other services, use this link.
To access the iTunes store page for “Don’t Let It Go…Unheard,” where you can find past episodes, subscribe, and leave ratings and reviews (pretty please!), use this link.
Finally, if you would like to support the show financially, please donate using your Pay Pal account or Credit Card here.
Program Notes
Donald Trump’s Cowardice on ‘Dreamers’
Our President's attempt to eat his cake and have it, too. #DACA https://t.co/iNs6vrPSsW
— Amy Peikoff 🇺🇸 (@AmyPeikoff) September 6, 2017
A Discussion with Yaron Brook on Immigration Policy
So you think that every law on the books today is just? Appealing to our founding principle–individual rights–is not appealing to emotion. https://t.co/5L2xVvgLqw
— Amy Peikoff 🇺🇸 (@AmyPeikoff) September 4, 2017
Hurricane looks like largest ever recorded in the Atlantic!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 6, 2017
The Philosophy of Andy Warhol (From A to B and Back Again)
Why We Should Put Women on Pedestals
Buyer beware: Courts could raise cost of online shopping
Steve Jobs gave us President Trump
Silicon Valley’s Politics: Liberal, With One Big ExceptionHT Steve Richins on Twitter
Don't Let It Go 