What Does the Supreme Court’s Cell Phone Privacy Ruling Say About NSA Surveillance?, today at 12 p.m. PT (3 p.m. ET)

Today we’ll discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling in Riley v. California (joined with United States v. Wurie), in which the Court held that a government agent may not peruse the data held on a cell phone as part of a warrantless “search incident to arrest.” In order to search data on a cell phone, the government agent would need either to get a warrant, or to search pursuant to another exception to the warrant requirement (e.g., exigent circumstances). We’ll discuss the ruling itself and also its possible implications for the cases on which I have my primary focus: those challenging the NSA’s bulk metadata collection program.

We’ll also discuss a lot more–see Program Notes, below, for all the stories, etc., we plan to discuss.

Join in live, either by phone or in the chatroom!

The show can be accessed here.

To access the show’s page at BlogTalk Radio, which will allow you to check out a past episode or to subscribe via iTunes and other services, use this link.

To access the iTunes store page for “Don’t Let It Go…Unheard,” where you can find past episodes, subscribe, and leave ratings and reviews (pretty please!), use this link.

Finally, if you would like to support the podcast financially, please donate using your Pay Pal account or Credit Card here.

Program Notes

A Brief Response to Peter Schwartz on Edward Snowden

Riley v. California

“Digital Evidence and the New Criminal Procedure” — 10 Years Later

Supreme Court Narrows President’s Recess-Appointment Powers

DC Circuit strikes down DC tour guide licensing law

Report: Polish minister calls US ties worthless HT Rob Abiera

Obama Proposes $500 Million to Aid Syrian Rebels

Parents, teachers, education board members ask Oklahoma state Supreme Court to throw out repeal of Common Core HT Rob Abiera

White House Press Secretary: ‘We’re Not Just Going To Sit Around And Wait’ For Congress To Write Laws HT Bosch Fawstin

Report: Mexican Military Chopper Crosses Into US, Shoots At Border Agents

Emails: IRS official sought audit of GOP senator

Culture can help tame eminent domain abuse HT Rob Abiera

Technology Helps Customers and Innovators Ignore Regulators Who Target Uber and Lyft HT Rob Abiera

Fact Check: The New York Times “The Corporate Daddy”

New York’s Ban on Big Sodas Is Rejected by Final Court HT Bosch Fawstin

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Don't Let It Go...Unheard

5 responses to “What Does the Supreme Court’s Cell Phone Privacy Ruling Say About NSA Surveillance?, today at 12 p.m. PT (3 p.m. ET)

  1. Craig

    Still Report #288 – NSA’s Bill Binney – Part 1

    Still Report #290 – NSA’s Bill Binney – Part 2

  2. Craig

    Still Report #291 – NSA’s Bill Binney – Part 3

  3. Craig

    Still Report #293 – NSA’s Bill Binney – Part 4

  4. Craig

    Still Report #294 – NSA’s Bill Binney – Part 5

  5. Craig

    Still Report #295 – NSA’s Bill Binney – Part 6

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s